翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Goodman's paradox : ウィキペディア英語版
New riddle of induction

Grue and bleen are predicates coined by Nelson Goodman in ''Fact, Fiction, and Forecast'' to illustrate the "new riddle of induction". These predicates are unusual because their application to things is time dependent. For Goodman they illustrate the problem of projectable predicates and ultimately, which empirical generalizations are law-like and which are not.
Goodman's construction and use of ''grue'' and ''bleen'' illustrates how philosophers use simple examples in conceptual analysis.
==Grue and bleen defined==
Goodman defined grue relative to an arbitrary but fixed time ''t'' as follows:〔Historically, Goodman used ''"V-E day"'' and ''"a certain time t"'' in ''A Query on Confirmation'' (p. 383) and ''Fact, fiction, and forecast'' (3rd ed. 1973, p. 73), respectively.〕 An object is grue if and only if it is observed before ''t'' and is green, or else is not so observed and is blue. An object is bleen if and only if it is observed before ''t'' and is blue, or else is not so observed and is green.〔http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism〕
To understand the problem Goodman posed, it is helpful to imagine some arbitrary future time ''t'', say January 1, . For all green things we observe up to time ''t'', such as emeralds and well-watered grass, both the predicates ''green'' and ''grue'' apply. Likewise for all blue things we observe up to time ''t'', such as bluebirds or blue flowers, both the predicates ''blue'' and ''bleen'' apply. On January 2, , however, emeralds and well-watered grass are now ''bleen'' and bluebirds or blue flowers are now ''grue''. Clearly, the predicates ''grue'' and ''bleen'' are not the kinds of predicates we use in everyday life or in science, but the problem is that they apply in just the same way as the predicates ''green'' and ''blue'' up until some future time ''t''. From our current perspective (i.e., before time ''t''), how can we say which predicates are more projectable into the future: ''green'' and ''blue'' or ''grue'' and ''bleen''?

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「New riddle of induction」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.